David Chandler

UPDATED: NSW building commissioner David Chandler OAM has shocked the building and construction industry by tendering his resignation on Monday, after an internal investigation cleared him of false claims that he’d misled parliament.

Mr Chandler, a highly respected figure within the industry, had been the subject of an internal investigation following allegations in The Australian that he had misled state parliament.

That investigation has now concluded. The Department of Customer Service has confirmed to The Fifth Estate that it found those claims to be unsubstantiated, and that reports of tensions with Department of Customer Service staff are also false.

Mr Chandler advised Department of Customer Service secretary Emma Hogan of his decision to resign on Monday, after the investigation was completed.

The Fifth Estate understands Mr Chandler will remain in the role until November, and will focus his work on building reforms and the Project Remediate cladding removal program.

Parliamentary and industry sources told The Fifth Estate they had been surprised by sudden news of the resignation.

In just the past few weeks, he had briefed a number of NSW MPs about his upcoming work on cladding remediation, and attendees said he seemed enthusiastic about his role. 

A video is mysteriously leaked

The catalyst for the sudden decision to stand aside appears to stem from an article that was published in The Australian on 24 June.

The newspaper published a leaked video, which it claimed showed Mr Chandler at a building site telling construction workers he has presented the banks with an informal list of certifiers that he “wouldn’t be bloody having on a job”. 

The article claimed the video was recorded in August of last year, but it does not reveal either who created the mysterious clip, who leaked it to the paper, or why.

The problem, Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party MP Mark Banasiak told The Fifth Estate, was that video appeared to contradict comments Mr Chandler made to parliament that his role does not include recommending specific certifiers. 

Following the article’s publication, NSW Small Business Minister Eleni Petinos launched an internal investigation, which has been led by Department of Customer Service secretary Emma Hogan.

That investigation has cleared Mr Chandler of those claims.

“An internal investigation into allegations of misleading parliament were found to be unsubstantiated. Reports of fractious relationships with Departmental staff are also false,” a spokesperson for the Department of Customer Service told The Fifth Estate

“Mr Chandler will continue his work with industry and the Department in coming months with a continued focus on building reforms and the cladding remediation program.

“Recruitment for a replacement will take place in due course.”

Unusually, for the resignation of a respected senior public servant, Mr Chandler’s resignation was leaked on Monday to the Margin Call gossip column in The Australian.

The Fifth Estate understands the full findings of that investigation are likely to be published sometime early next week.

Given the investigation’s findings are yet to be released, Mr Chandler is unable to provide any public comment on the matter.

Claims about a dysfunctional ministerial office

Several state parliamentary sources, from different parties, pointed out the “clear cultural issues” and high staff turnover in Ms Petinos’ office. Some had suggested this could have been a contributing factor in the resignation.

State MPs report getting so frustrated at the lack of response from Ms Petinos’ office that they have resorted to going to the premier’s office to resolve basic constituent inquiries.

The high staff turnover in the minister’s office led to an absurd exchange during a recent parliamentary committee session on 11 March, when the minister was being questioned about why there wasn’t more timely contact from her office to residents of the Opal Tower in Mascot.

During that session, Ms Petinos was asked directly how many staff she had in her office at that time. The minister just couldn’t give a straight answer.

“You would appreciate that as a new office people have only been onboarding over the last few weeks, and not all positions are filled at this point in time,” Ms Peinos said.

When pressed on the precise number of staff in her office, Ms Petinos responded: “I believe five. I could stand corrected on that… I am sure the materiality of one person would not change the answer.”

The Fifth Estate reached out to the minister’s office about these claims, but did not receive a response prior to publication.

A legacy of bouquets and brickbats

Mr Chandler was originally appointed as NSW’s first building commissioner on 14 August 2019 by former state premier Gladys Berejiklian, following public outcry over serious construction defects at Sydney’s Mascot and Opal Towers.

Before taking on the role, Mr Chandler had been a regular high profile contributor to The Fifth Estate. He has more than 40 years experience as a construction industry practitioner and was awarded an Order of Australia medal in 1989 for his services.

He was tasked with investigating misconduct within the building industry, overseeing disciplinary action, managing licensing and auditing, and strengthening the state’s building laws. A year into his role, he gained the power to enter and inspect building sites.

Initially appointed for a two-year term, in April of this year Mr Chandler agreed to a one-year extension to his term that would have seen him stay on in the role until September 2023.

Among his many achievements were the introduction of “anytime anywhere” inspections, the creation of the iCIRT star-rating program for developer quality, and the creation of the Office of the Building Commissioner.

He also oversaw the introduction of the Residential Apartment Buildings Bill and Design and Building Practitioners Bill, which require all key consultants to insured, and holds people involved in the construction process accountable for the buildings they construct.

However, Mr Chandler’s work in cleaning up the industry led to what he described as “bouquets and brickbats” in an interview with The Fifth Estate last year

His work has earned high praise in some quarters, with many people in the built environment sector wishing they “had their own David Chandler”.  

At the same time, he’s been threatened with defamation, and accused of being connected to a “shakedown” by some more questionable figures in the industry.

One developer, whose project was found wanting, reportedly went so far as to refer Mr Chandler to the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

High praise and calls for an explanation from the minister

Urban Taskforce Australia chief executive Tom Forrest said while his organisation has not agreed with everything Mr Chandler has done, he was always willing to take the call, engage in debate, and take seriously any issue raised.

“David Chandler has won the respect of the property construction and development sector and this has been key to his success. He has also drawn praise from owners’ corporations and political leaders, ranging from Gladys Berejiklian to David Shoebridge (and everyone in between),” Mr Forrest said.

“Mr Chandler has completely reversed the focus of the inspectorate of the Department of Fair Trading. Rather than focusing 90 per cent of their time trying to fix problems after they have been occupied, David Chandler has overseen a transformation which now sees 90 per cent of the inspection effort focused on major defects prior to the occupation of the building.”

The NSW property development and construction sector, along with buyers of newly built apartments, are better off for Mr Chandler’s work and dedication, he said.

Association of Australian Certifiers chief executive Jill Brookfield said: “David was committed to lifting standards across the industry. While we didn’t always agree with everything, and he sometimes had unorthodox ways of doing things, overall he delivered the change that the industry needed.”

Shadow minister for better regulation and innovation Courtney Houssos called on the minister to provide a full explanation of the reasons behind the “dramatic and premature” departure of the building commissioner. 

“It’s really important that the minister explains who will be responsible for spearheading the government’s regulation of the building industry, which is a really important part of our state economy, but also most families’ most major financial investment,” Ms Houssos told The Fifth Estate.

“The community also needs the minister to explain the time frame and the process for replacing the building commissioner. And it’s vital that this is open and transparent.”

Know more? Email Andrew@TheFifthEstate.com.au.

Join the Conversation

3

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I’m having issue with Canterbury/ Bankstown Council and the Waratah Certifier.

    Hi I usually exhausts other avenues before reaching out for help.

    My issue is the neighbour has built a new lovely home plan approved 5 years ago works have been on going for 3 years on off he had trouble with builder and Covid time impacts.Builder left He became owner builder.

    When he started excavating under ground both neighbouring properties substained damages both sides home collapsing from bad shoring after a fight we both gave in were compensated peanuts til today neither of us have fixed the problem.

    This was 2021 myself going through my own emotional issues my mother had a stroke became bedridden with a peg tube at home my father also unwell I had to run to doctors every other day so I couldn’t really fight hard since I become a devoted and only carer, I didn’t engage in any carer concerned about Covid ?.

    My problem today is that the neighbour has nearly finished his home and I have sustained further damages thorough out I’m exhausted not only from sleep deprivation though researching, writing and reading about all about building codes since no one could help me.
    I would ring one place they would give me a number when I called I was sent elsewhere. It was is an absolute nightmare.

    The neighbours home (name is Devan) does not comply with the BCA his setbacks are m under 900mm both sides my biggest issue he pulled down an existing fence to erect another, his boundary wall and colorbond on top from front to rear has encroached over my property 165mm over with most of his boundary wall on my property.
    My Property 45.72 M by 10.06M.

    We never agreed to the unnecessary wall.

    When he started to build I asked him to stop since I noticed it had come over my property he ignored me so I engaged in a surveyor $1400,the property was pegged out I showed it to Devan he totally ignored me and continued.

    I contacted Council many times though they didn’t respond for a couple weeks by then the fence was aready erected I even called the police he was trespassing they came he showed police a false surveyor sketch police couldn’t do much a said they were building couldn’t do much.

    Man talk about being hit by bricks.

    Eventually Council stepped in a waste of time told me its not their problem REALLY to call certifier I called certifier they came out after I pushed and threatened, (mean while I’m trying to keep both my parents alive. )

    the certifier came out seen it briefly addressed my concerns by giving the neighbour a WORK DIRECTION NOTICE.

    This meant nothing this was only to shut me up to show they did address it.
    Devan was issued a WDN though my biggest issue it was being extended 3 times Why !! meanwhile he was building his home though my complaint was not being addressed.

    -He has encroached 165mm over with a boundary wall on my side

    -He sewerage pipes are on my property at the front

    And his setbacks do not comply.

    Amongst other issues

    I rang legal aid they told me this isn’t an area they deal with they mainly deal with poor people who are going through domestic issues.

    I was confused ?

    I have spent 4 months many emails ringing seeking advice for nothing to happen.

    I ended up ringing a lawyer a waste of time he was charging me to do nothing

    – I engaged in a builder inspector
    – a plumber
    – a surveyor

    I put a stop to the lawyer.

    I am pushing for all other departments to do their job

    I rang fair trading complained about the Certifier they responded by telling me they can’t help so I should contact council yet council has made it clear they want nothing to do with it.
    Even though i was told by Fair Trading they have to do something.

    I have made a complaint with the Ombudsman 10 weeks ago I have heard nothing.

    I wrote to Chris Minns the secretary send me details to contact CC: The Hon Michael Daley, Attorney General

    I rang many many departments I was lost there is no one else who I can reach out to.

    Going back to the certifier The certifier reassured me if he didn’t rectify he would not get his Occupational Certification this is untrue Devan pretty much is doing what he wants he has never complied with the regulation working afterall hours I called the ranger again they did nothing.
    He should not be at the home after 5pm.
    He was at the home all hours of the day with his family I complained he should not be occupying the home when the certifier addressed it with him again he lied told them he wasn’t,even after I submitted photos.
    You see I thought if I stop him for being able to go to his property he would feel the pressure to give me back my land and rectify the problems though I was unsupported by everyone.

    10 December he WDN ended I don’t know if his OC is cleared I rang council i rang certifier no on wants to know me ignoring me.

    My dilemma I’m facing now is this,I’m a pretty determined person I believe one needs to do what’s right no matter what. I never gave up though how about if I was a pensioner or someone that hasn’t got the ability to fight what would I do?
    This is so damn wrong
    I had few suggestions to go to Land Environment Court why would I go spent $50K to fight for what if righteously mine this is totally unacceptable and ridiculous.
    If council had stepped in when they were suppose to I am a rate payer it would not of escalated this far and I would not have only one option to spend 50K that I don’t have spare.
    We need change we need to make sure that if someone rebuilds the DA plan complies and it does not impact neighbouring properties and if it does ONLY COUNCIL should fix the problem by steeping in.
    They are lazy carting off their work load.

    Last few months when this problem arose as mentioned I spent a lot of time on this unfortunately one of my parents paid the ultimate price I couldn’t sustain the care unfortunately my darling father passed 4th July after I had looked after him for 20 years whilst he was in dependent though needed to go doctors though last few years was dependent on me. The guilt haunts me my poor mama is sad.?

    This is why I will not give up and refuse to pour anymore money to date I have spent $6000 I don’t want to spent anymore neither should other people.

    We need change we need it now !!!!

    Sorry to babble on though I just don’t know where to turn could you help or even refer me to someone that does actually care.

    Thank you so much for reading my issue

    Sorry for any inconvenience caused
    if you can’t suggest or help

    TODAY IS A BAD DAY DEVAN GOT HIS OC AND DID NOT RECTIFY MY ISSUES AFTER I SPENT MANY HOURS ON IT.

    Happy Festive Season

    Kind regards

    Patrizia Ascenza
    Croydon park

    1. Hi Patrizia, we normally don’t do much on domestic building issues as we don’t have that kind of capacity as, you will no doubt understand, the impost of tackling equity or justice when a builder damages other people’s property and sometimes their own client’s – takes a massive amount of energy, time and resources. But I was keen to empathise as I too have been affected by similar concerns.
      I know it’s hard to find anyone to take responsibility for these deliberate or careless damages, in my case quite wilful – with the builder telling me his client’s instructions were to continue with the damaging work “until the [council] ranger arrives”. But like you, I discovered the council was not interested. They said to go to the private certifier, who is paid by the builder’s client, police refused to stop the damage occurring even though it was in real time because it was a “domestic matter” which I am still trying to compute. And the council also tried to put it all in perspective by telling me they’ve got bigger fish to fry – such as scaffolding and bricks falling on passers by. A ranger was slated to come but not for a week or more.
      In the end a builder friend put it all in perspective by explaining that the system is designed especially to support and enable new action and activity not the cessation of it…despite the legal or ownership or equity/theft issues involved. So justice was never the intent.
      Reminded me of the time that I wrote a story for another publication where I discovered that if someone scams you out of your property (for those of us lucky enough to own one), the law will favour the new buyer not the person robbed (who must sue the thief for recovery) Why? Because the law is designed to support faith in the conveyancing system. If I’m wrong and there is a legal eagle who can expound on this please get in touch, though it was a lawyer who provided the insight in the first place.
      Patrizia (no doubt) and I both would love to hear why we need to roll over and play victim when a builder – or property thief – gets involved.

  2. Not surprised, but extremely disappointed that it seems ok for polies and others to chew up and spit out amazing and such well intended individuals such as David Chandler.
    For the record, I didn’t entirely agree with David’s approach to his job at Service NSW. From what I saw, he didn’t properly research, ingest, process and then view the data to the extent that would have been required to properly achieve his goals and objectives. He did however man up and not tolerate any nonsense from the construction world and he came out swinging every time and always with good and meaningful intent.
    For the many years now that I have known David, I have witnessed him only ever try his level best to help our community. My view of David is that his way was to help by making living on our planet better for all, not just those who could afford it. He was and no doubt still is a tireless fighter for what is fair and the sad thing here is that our state and federal leaders clearly felt no reason to oblige this wonderful human the same common curtesy he so freely gave to so many others.
    Hang tough David, relax for now and then maybe think about how you can attack so many important issues from another angle perhaps.
    Most importantly, stay true to yourself David because you are one of the good people in our community.
    lots of love to you mate, Jim